Yesterday's news (10-24-08): Obama Birth Certificate: Obama Citizenship Lawsuits Spread to Eight States
Today's news (10-25-08):Case thrown out of federal court, appealed to Supreme court. The updates:
-----------------------------------------
Federal Court Judge Throws Out Obama Birth Certificate Challenge
A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.
Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.
They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.
Surrick agreed.
******************
Press Release: Berg v. Obama dismissed - Berg appealing to U. S. Supreme Court
Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
-----------------------------------
A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.
Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.
They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.
Surrick agreed.
******************
Press Release: Berg v. Obama dismissed - Berg appealing to U. S. Supreme Court
Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
-----------------------------------
re: "we the people have no right"..."constitutional crisis"
update on 3rd Birth Certificate Lawsuit Against Obama Filed In Hawaii (quoted comment): "Should be very interesting when the 'madness of the method' in this Obama mystery becomes clear."
The 'madness of the method', i.e. the desired end result of all the very elaborate production of this soap opera Obama mystery may actually be coming into some clarity now as this debacle looks to be heading to the U.S. Supreme Court, if it makes it there that is. The federal judge, Surrick, finally threw the case out, ruling that the lawyer, Berg, did not have standing to challenge the eligibility of the NWO's BO. The lawyer, Berg, is pressing the case on that point asking the question of who then does have the right to question the 'powers that be', so to speak, and warning 'we the people' of a "constitutional crisis if this case is not resolved forthwith".
This now raises the possibility that this entire particular 'Election 2008' plot twist has been designed to achieve that very thing, a constitutional crisis. That would make it nothing more than a cleverly crafted object lesson for all 'homeland citizens'.
Whether the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case or accepts the case and then throws it out for the same reasons (as scripted?) as did the Federal Court judge, the message would be abundantly clear: "We the people have no right" (rights) any longer to question authority i.e. Big Brother, meaning...forget what the constitution says...it's a thing of the past.
Created crisis (chaos) to establish the new order, i.e. submission to the would-be global masters?
Keep watching...the 'beast' is baring his fangs.
2 comments :
Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!
Like you say Ted..it "should be" a PR disaster...except the catch is the part about it being handled right. What's becoming very apparent imo is that it is the same "handlers" who are handling both sides...who btw are the same ones who handle the msm...who for the most part, except for a relatively small percentage, control public opinion.
This whole thing is being carefully choreographed and it may just be for the purpose of steamrolling right over the Constitution in broad daylight..the NWO'ers thumbing their noses and laughing at the soon to be North American Union 'homelanders'(to which the 'obsolete' U.S. Constitution will not apply anyway)...a not so subtle little way to let them know that there's nothing they can do about it.
That's all conjecture of course, but we'll first have to wait and see if BO actually does get the nod to pied pipe the country into the globalized future...
Rev. 18:4
Post a Comment