'Responsibility Czars' Questioning Right To Refuse H1N1 Injections

Follow up on: Swine Flu Being Used to Condition Masses To Draconian Controls 5-3-09 “People in our government need to start thinking about how, if this actually becomes a pandemic, how it’s going to affect our daily life and our rights,” [...says one panelist, before raising the issue of whether people who try to escape quarantines or refuse mandatory vaccinations should face jail time] " (see post, video)
***
Swine Flu Vaccine: Is It Ethical to Say No?
Some Say Getting Immunized Is a Matter of Social Responsibility

Does Americans' right to determine what is best for themselves and their families trump the federal government's efforts to head off what it believes could be a flu pandemic?

So far, many Americans are balking at the vaccinations, saying there are too many questions about the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine, considering that, for most, the illness does not present a serious threat, according to health experts.

The debate is "changing the parameters" for individual responsibility, says Andrew Askland, director of the Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology at Arizona State University in Tempe.

Officials at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are strongly urging vaccination for a majority of Americans, including all kids and pregnant women. Officials have stopped short, however, of calling vaccination a moral imperative, instead urging Americans to think deeply about their perceptions and the communal impact of their decisions.
---------------------------------------------
re: 'changing the parameters', 'officials'

This is a second quote from the follow-up post linked above:

“The global fire drill known as "swine flu" has created, ordo ab chao style, the perfect opportunity to further condition John Q. Public to the types of draconian control measures which will be necessary to establish the so-called NWO."

Just what exactly are the rights of the individual in the 'pandemic-prone' new world order? This is the question that is "changing the parameters [of] individual responsibility", says the apparent 'responsibility czar' Andrew Askland. Conditioning the population for submission to the NWO agenda is the only parameter that is being changed though. Note the phrase "officials have stopped short". John Q. Public is to now be conditioned to understand that he is obligated to obey those designated as 'officials' in this new pandemic-world. 'This time'...said officials are "stopping short"...but 'next time'...they may not. Got it...

Without absolute authority the NWO can never be established. H1n1 is to facilitate that goal. Belgium is already under military rule, the Federal government in the U.S. has rewritten quarantine laws, the U.S. military and 500,000 health care workers in NY State are as of now under mandatory vaccination orders, the State of Maine is under emergency declaration, and the 'responsibility officials' are now informing John Q. that he needs to "think deeply about his communal impact".

'Communal impact' means that John Q's rights really do not actually "trump" Big Brother's agenda at all. Got it...

For Big Brother to rule the land, establishing draconian control is not optional. The conditioning exercises will be unrelenting from here on out. See through it all.
***
compare:
Swine '09: Belgium 1st Country To Go Under Military Rule Because Of 'H1N1' Hoax 9-25-09
1st State, Maine, Declares H1N1 "Civil Emergency" 9-3-09

'Swine '09': Federal Government Clearing Path To Quarantines? 8-11-09
Big Brother says "Get Your #@!% Vaccine" 8-27-09
-------------------------------------------
Psalms 119:98 Thou through thy commandments hast made me wiser than mine enemies: for they are ever with me.