WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that police officers have leeway to frisk a passenger in a car stopped for a traffic violation even if nothing indicates the passenger has committed a crime or is about to do so.
The justices accepted Arizona's argument that traffic stops are inherently dangerous for police and that pat-downs are permissible when an officer has a reasonable suspicion that the passenger may be armed and dangerous.
The pat-down is allowed if the police "harbor reasonable suspicion that a person subjected to the frisk is armed, and therefore dangerous to the safety of the police and public," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said.
----------------------------------------------------------
re: 'pat-downs are permissible'
Open season on the Constitution has begun apparently. In this instance, concerning routine traffic stops, the now clearly NWO-complicit SCOTUS has just erased another line of personal freedom in the land of the
TSA Given Gestapo Powers? 9-23-08
------------------------------------------------------
John 8:36 'If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.'
No comments :
Post a Comment