5/27/15

Nationwide Police-Shooting Psyops/Drama End Game Now Clear: Cleveland 'Federalizing' Police - Ordo Ab Chao

Follow up on: Martial Law Script: National Guard Deployed In Milwaukee After 3rd 'White-Cop-Kills-Black-Man' Non-Indictment 12-23-14 "'Cui bono? Either citizens are getting gunned down all over the place in the US of A these days, or, it is just being made to appear to be so...via endless staged productions...in order to create an illusion...to gain an objective' -- not only is it cops (allegedly) shooting citizens, but, we are now being told, it is also now citizens (allegedly) shooting cops (2 [alleged] incidents in just the past week). As far as creating a chaotic scenario conducive to enabling the implementing of the ZNWO totalitarian agenda, the way this is unfolding, couldn't have been scripted any better if they tried...Real or an illusion? The rolling out of a full scale police state takeover of Amerika as a 'solution' to all these 'current events' is no illusion, that is ridiculously evident. Fact is it is now a full court press. Presto change-o...trance-formation accomplished' [see post]
***
Cleveland police department agrees to carry out federal reforms

The Cleveland police department, which has been criticised for aggressive tactics against African Americans, has agreed to strict federal reforms. Mayor Frank Jackson said on Tuesday that the police will adhere to the most exacting standards in the US.

The US Department of Justice settlement comes after a series of cases where officers killed unarmed people.

An independent monitor will track the police department's progress.

Officers will also undergo mental health consultations.

If the city does not carry out the terms of the settlement, known as a consent decree, a federal judge has the authority to demand them.

Mr Jackson said all police officers will have body cameras by the end of 2015.

"Today marks a new way of policing in the city of Cleveland, one built on a strong foundation of systemic change," Mr Jackson said of the agreement with the DOJ.

The agreement comes on the heels of racial tensions and police-involved shooting deaths of Freddie Gray in Baltimore, Maryland, Eric Garner in New York City and Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

Baltimore and Ferguson's police departments have also came under close scrutiny of the Department of Justice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re: 'series of cases' ... 'agreed to strict federal reforms'

Plain as can be. Baltimore, New York, Ferguson, just to note the most recent high profile chaos-inducers, and Cleveland, where the end-game of this sudden craze of police-dramas playing out across the country over the last year or so has now been made clear as day. And classic ordo ab chao it is. Chaos everywhere creates the opportunity for the 'new order' to come out of the 'chao' - exactly what is now happening in Cleveland.
Authentic Jewish-Masonic membership certificate
with team motto emblazoned across top
Apparently John Q. Public is to believe that the city of Cleveland is not capable of handling their police issues so that authority must now be relinquished to federal control. This is what the Mayor of Cleveland has termed a "systemic change", and a "new way of policing".

And wouldn't you know it, this "new way of policing", this "systemic change" taking place, just so happens to be exactly what the planned Zionist-new-world-order agenda calls for: federalizing the police. Cleveland today, Baltimore, Ferguson, your city tomorrow. It's begun.

A monolithic national police system and a regional-continental system (aka Agenda21) of global government go hand in hand. It could not work any other way.

Transitioning the US into regional global government, most likely the NAU aka Canamerexico, will not happen without a definite strategy. This would have to include 'federalizing' the police, which is to then no doubt come under a military oversight - which is where NORTHCOM comes into the equation. That what is now transpiring as a result of the endless police-ordo-ab-chao episodes of late (with no sign of stopping) is actually the outworking of such a transition-effort is 'plain as can be'.

Cleveland starting the open-transition to US police federalization is taking the whole thing to the next level. Be informed.
 Rev. 18:4
***
Compare: Fox News Iconic Baltimore Riot Photo Turns Out To Be Completely Fake -- It's All Scripted 5-3-15

Also: 'When Everything...Public Believes Is False'...Disinfo Program Will Be Complete - William Casey CIA/ZWO 1981 1-8-15
~~~
5-29-15 related: Agenda To Federalize Police Advances Again: Oakland, CA Police Becoming Branch Of FBI
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And...ten kings shall arise' Dan 7:24

22 comments :

Anonymous said...

Equally odd goings on over the pond. Queen's “one nation” speech. Coded news, “Hatton Garden (aka jewish diamond quarter) 'easter' jewel heist - thieves miraculously plunder the tomb, but get caught exactly 7 weeks later, in fact on the eve of Pentecost... and tonight, “Apocalypse Code: Bible Predictions” http://www.channel5.com/shows/mysteries-of-the-bible/episodes/armageddon-4 a 58min (?) programme entirely dedicated to disparaging the rapture; Christians and the bible as a whole. The timing is suspect, the rhetoric is... Blasphemous. Smacks of desperation and the good ol' hidden in plain sight warning to the sheeple.

Christsfreeservnt said...

Anonymous, I looked into the Queen's "one nation" speech, but I am uncertain what it is that you find odd about it. I have had this sense for several days that something significant was going on right now with the Queen and with David Cameron, but I have not, as yet, put all the pieces together, i.e. I have not really pursued it to great depth in prayer, inquiring of God as to what is going on. So, I am quite curious as to what you see with this speech and how it might affect, not just the people of the U.K., but the world as a whole.

Tom, I definitely see what you are saying about this situation in Cleveland and how it is much bigger than just an isolated incident. I do see what you see concerning the direction this is all headed, but all glory to God, for he puts these things in my heart and he leads me to search these things out. I like to read your blog and I do thank you for being diligent in bringing these things to our attention. So, thank you for sharing this. It was very confirming. Sue

Anonymous said...

Christsfreeservant, David - ‘call me Dave’ - Cameron, through his paternal grandmother, Enid Agnes Maud Levita, is a lineal descendant of King William IV by his mistress Dorothea Bland, and; is a fifth cousin once removed of Queen Elizabeth.
His paternal great-great-grandfather, Emile George Charles Levita, a German Jewish financier, was married to Katherine Plumridge Rée, from the wealthy Danish Jewish Rée family.

So both are, Club of Rome, Ashkenazi 'Jews' - Revelation 3:9.
“Organized in 1968 by the Morgenthau Group (Jewish), the Club of Rome’s purpose is to accelerate the plans for all nations to be combined in a One World Government, and to eliminate the vast majority of the world’s 6 billion people by abortion, infanticide, diseases and wars.” (Source: http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/political/newworld_order/world_order.htm)

Highlights of the queen's towel of babel 'one nation' speech:
‘Investigatory Powers Bill’
Allows security agencies to access communications data of “terrorists , paedophiles and other serious criminals”
‘Extremism Bill’
New anti-extremism measures include: Banning orders, to allow the Home Secretary to ban extremist groups; Extremism Disruption Orders, a “new power for law enforcement to stop individuals engaging in extremist behaviour”, and closure orders, to allow the police to shut down premises “used to support extremism.” Under a new set of employment checks, bosses will be able to “check whether an individual is an extremist and bar them from working with children.
(Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/queens-speech/11632050/Queens-Speech-2015-Live.html)

The target is, as always Christianity; and the spiritual wickedness is in high places.

Christsfreeservnt said...

What do you know about UNAOC? http://www.unaoc.org/

Just following a lead, and so far this is where it took me, and it seems to fit with the whole "extremists" thing, since dealing with "extremism" seems to be one of their main objectives. It was formed in the aftermath of 9/11.

The Lord had the name "Turkey" come to mind this evening, and this led me to the UNAOC. I looked at some things the Lord had taught me previously about this country, and one of them is that "Pergamum was situated where the modern-day city of Bergama, in Turkey, is now situated. It was “the ancient capital of Asia,” and “its name means ‘Citadel’” (a fortress; strongly fortified - Encarta) - Source: NIV Study Bible. Pergamum is "where Satan has his throne."

As well, there seemed to be some connection here to Obama's 2009 Cairo speech, which was, in fact, very telling of his (i.e. the people to whom he answers) intentions.

Anonymous said...

*Tower of Babel.
Ps/ hope I haven't stated the obvious.
In answer to your actual question, I view the UK and its monarchy playing a key role in the wider revived 'holy' roman empire plot.
IMHO (by the Holy Spirit's leading), the world's favourite red-head, Prince Harry is one to watch. Remember, his (blasphemous) 'I AM' /Invictus shenanigans? And this month's Haka (Maori war-dance) performance in New Zealand on a Wednesday... (Woden'sday - norse god of war). I had to mute the TV when it was reported, on repeat. He appeared to be possessed.
Much of the MSM output - which is highly occult in nature.
1 Samuel 15:22-23.

Anonymous said...

I hadn't heard of the UNAOC. But the clue is in the 'eye' logo and the fact that it's an offshoot of the UN, which is anything but humanitarian. Point in case, UN ambassador Jolie and her war-against-women-body-mutilation-fear campaign. They are change agents. In the worst possible sense of the phrase.

tom m. said...

A comment on the subject of 'Antichrist identifying': There is a big problem with this, which is to say, it cannot be done. Scripture, interpreted correctly, is clear that the 'AC' cannot now be on the scene, or known. This was the topic of a comment thread from a few months back. Rather than go over it again, below are a few quotes from that thread touching on the topic and a link to the thread for any interested:

- Main thing to understand clearly though is that there is absolutely no way possible that the 'real AC' can appear on the world stage yet. The world's stage is not yet set for his arrival; see: 10 kings shall arise - Dan. 7:24

- Dan. 7:24 "..and another shall rise after them" [the key word is 'rise']

- The AC cannot "rise" [be a known person] until 'after' all these things [the 10 kings appear]

- Further, and although there are many non-believers on the scriptural teaching of the "rapture" of the church, the Word of God is clear on the point that the real "Antichrist" cannot come on the scene until after the church is removed

- The rapture of the true church has not happened, the AC cannot "go forth" [Rev. 6:2] or "rise". Impossible. Adhering closely to the Word of God is the only safe ground.

link to full thread: here


Looking for 'Antichrist' is totally unbiblical for a believer. The body of Christ will never see the AC. Antichrist absolutely cannot arrive on the scene until after the 'bride of Christ' has been taken to the Father's house [John 14:2-3]. The believer is instructed to be looking only for, and waiting for, the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ* - this is the believer's "blessed hope" - Titus 2:13

Everything today is premature for the AC's 'rise'. As discussed in the thread linked above, and in this post from some time back - NWO faking antichrist and false prophet; what is seemingly going on is that a massive deception is underway involving a fake antichrist. Looking for potential antichrist-candidates today puts lookers in danger of falling prey to this deception [see post].

Of course now, for rapture-deniers, none of this applies...so being a looky-loo is the only option you're left with. The Head of the body, the Lord Jesus Christ who shed his own blood on the cross of Calvary [Luke 23:33] for his very own body [Eph. 5:23], judging and pouring out his wrath on his own body in the tribulation [Rev. 6:15-17]? - this teaching comes not from the Holy Spirit of God though.

*1Thes. 1:5, 7-10: 'For our gospel came not unto you in word only, but also in power, and in the Holy Ghost, and in much assurance...So that ye were ensamples to all that believe...how ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God; And to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come'

Christsfreeservnt said...

Thank you, Anonymous, for answering my question to the best of your understanding.

Anonymous said...

Tom, you're right. No matter the signs and lying wonders, we need to keep our eyes firmly fixed on Jesus Christ. Our redemtion draws near. Thanks.

Christsfreeservnt said...

UNAOC – United Nations Alliance of Civilizations

Vision Statement:

Guided by the principles of the UN Charter, the report of its High-Level Group, and the priorities of the Secretary-General, the UN Alliance of Civilizations will, over the next five years, work toward a more peaceful, more socially inclusive world, by building mutual respect among peoples of different cultural and religious identities, highlighting the will of the world’s majority to reject extremism and embrace diversity. UNAOC will seek to operate in situations where is can contribute to broader efforts to ameliorate identity based crises and promote culturally sensitive development policies.

Mission Statement:

The High-level group described UNAOC as an entity that would assist in diminishing hostility and promoting harmony among the nations. The UN Secretary-General has described it as a soft power tool for bridging divides and promoting understanding between countries or identity groups, all with a view toward preventing conflict and promoting social cohesion…

http://www.unaoc.org/who-we-are/

I believe we all know where this is headed. We can read about it in Revelation 12-14.

Kayfabe said...

So if there is such a thing as a pre trib rapture then why did Martha tell Jesus in John 11:23-24 "Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again.. Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day. "

Martha clearly understood that the resurrection of the dead was at the last day and Jesus didn't correct her at that. Not only that but scripture clearly teaches that those who are alive in Christ waiting for his return will not precede those who are dead in Christ. So obviously if the dead in Christ rise at the last day as Martha clearly understood in the above verse and those who are alive are raptured after them, then it is clear that the Church is raptured at the last day. See the below scripture that tag teams with John 11 : 23-24 to blow pre trib rapture teaching out of the water.

1 Thessalonians chapter 4:15-16"For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trump of God : and the dead in Christ SHALL rise first : "

So we know from scripture the dead rise (resurrection) at the last day and those who are alive will rise (rapture) after the dead. The only plain sense conclusion can be that the rapture of the Church is at the Last day and not before the tribulation.

tom m. said...

Kayfabe

Back again?

Once again, you really should learn the Word of God before you appoint yourself to speak about the Word of God - Hebrews 5:4

Many things in the Word are revealed progressively. Why would anybody expect to find the explicit teaching of the rapture in The gospel of John? This incident in John 11 was before the cross. This was before any even understood the death, burial, resurrection, and ascension of Christ. This was before the revelation of the church, or of the body of Christ as a group distinct from the Jewish system. It was before the revelation of the "mystery" of the indwelling Holy Spirit - Col. 1:26-27. This all came later.

How then expect ye to find the specific teaching of the 'rapture of the body of Christ' at that point in time? Could not be.

The things pertaining to the church were not revealed until later, and that primarily by the apostle Paul - Gal. 1:11-12; Romans 16:25

Before fighting against any doctrine, it is imperative to be correct. To fight against a doctrine and be wrong is to oppose the Spirit of God himself - and the cost of this can be very high - Luke 8:18

Anyway, the sentences above in question form are rhetorical.

Even so, come, Lord Jesus - Rev. 22:20

TruthVigilantee said...

It is interesting to note the tone each commenter takes. One is of a tamed spirit and the other comes in attacking that commenter's character and sounding very lofty and arrogant in these accusations. Firstly, Kayfabe is correct. That is why he is correct, he HAS studied the scriptures. So therefore all the attacking words apply to tom m rather than kayfabe. Heat goes in both directions so don't complain. Secondly, you are incorrect on the progressive revelation of scripture. Jesus DID know these events in advance and He revealed them before any of those other events occurred that you mentioned. He mentioned being caught up in Matthew 24 as well as the companion sections in the other gospels, both of which, by the way, are not pretrib. Further, if any doubt should still remain, 2 Thessalonians 2; 1-12 makes it perfectly clear that the rapture is at the end of the trib, not the beginning, we are caught up in the gathering on the day of the Lord. We witness the unveiling of antichrist, BEFORE being caught up, as Paul clearly says, completely refuting a pretrib rapture theory (they say we won't even see antichrist, clearly contradicted by scripture but convenient for the nwo apostates who want the church to receive the antichrist). Then, there are numerous types in the old testament that outline a prewrath (not pretrib) rapture, but it would take a good bible student to spot them. So yes, doctrine is key, on that you are correct. I won't be back for the fallout/backlash, thanks all the same.

TruthVigilantee said...

Oh and I saw that other comment that explains everything, total deception at work there as it contradicts everything.

1. The world stage IS set for antichrist to come on the scene.
2. He MAY already be here.
3. Most won't recognize him due to the apostasy (and deceptions of other natures).
4. The church CANNOT be raptured until he DOES come on the scene.
5. Rapture is NOT pretrib, but towards the end of the tribulation.
6. The apostasy is underway to prepare the church to receive the antichrist while telling them they will never see him and need not worry.
7. All of this is so that they will receive him and won't recognize him for who he really is.
8. No bible verse says that we won't be able to identify the antichrist.
9. Keeping our eyes fixed on Jesus is not in contradiction with identifying antichrist, the Holy Spirit is perfectly capable of pointing out multiple things to us.
10. Jesus Himself told us to WATCH and PRAY and DO NOT BE DECEIVED.
11. No one knows who those 10 kings are (or aren't).
12. The whole end times bible prophesy industry has invested millions (and raked them in also) in deceiving the modern church on end times bible prophesy, as part of Apostasy, Inc., so DO NOT rely on heretical books, movies, etc. by such as Tim LaHaye (who contradicts scripture repeatedly in Left Behind, such as destiny of those taking the mark, etc.). Rely ONLY on the Word of God and prayer for understanding, the rest will only lead to deception. Disinformation agents abound.
13. Those taking the mark go to hell, no 'buts'. You cannot deny Jesus under ANY circumstances. There is no such thing as a 'secret' Christian. If someone asks you if you are a Christian, if you are, you must confess and not deny. See bible on that. "But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven." Matthew 10; 33
Continued below...

TruthVigilantee said...

Just because we know the rapture isn't pretrib doesn't mean we "don't want the Lord to return" or to return soon. We are only looking at biblical facts. Further, it is better to be prepared for persecution than assume we won't suffer, because WE WILL FACE PERSECUTION! The danger is in thinking the rapture will come before suffering, to rescue you. That is unbiblical. Jesus told ALL His followers that they WILL suffer, and face persecution for His namesake. That has been the case all throughout church history. See Foxe's Book of Martyrs through 21st century, see news events of persecution of Christians all over the world, middle east, north korea, etc., and that IS real. It is already happening in the U.S. and will increase. Google for these news items if you doubt. American Christians are no special exception to this rule. It will only get worse as the chaff is sifted from the wheat. If you are not prepared to suffer persecution for being a Christian, you'd better get prepared, and quickly! Revelation 12; 11

"Now we request you, brethren, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, that you not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one in any way deceive you, for IT (the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ AND our gathering together to Him) will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God. Do you not remember that while I was still with you, I was telling you these things?" 2 Thessalonians 2
Go see for yourself. That is the bible, nothing else can contradict it, even scriptures that were twisted and taken out of context!

If you come away with any other interpretation than the antichrist is revealed BEFORE the rapture, then you are deceiving yourself and others. The rapture and return are all rolled into one, that is also evident. It is time to wake up!
I'm saying all of this out of love, so please, wake up! Throw all those apostate 'books, movies, etc.' away or burn them. There is a mass deception in all of popular culture 'Christianity'.
I won't be back for replies. That is all I have to say on this.

tom m. said...

Vigilante,

A quote from you: "I won't be back for replies. That is all I have to say on this"

No reason to reply seeing you have made your position of pre-trib non-belief very clear.

There is one thing that i'll respond to though, as you have charged me with "total deception".

My response will not have anything to do with addressing your "pre-wrath" version of 'last things' though.

My response is an observation, and has to do with the name you have chosen to use to identify yourself.

And to be clear, this is not a jab, but something that is actually telling:

A 'vigilante' by definition is one who is not appointed by any, but self-appointed, essentially taking the law into their hands.

Here now is a problem. God the Holy Spirit does not use "vigilantes". The Holy Ghost uses only those whom he himself calls and sends; for example - Acts 13:2

Those who are self-sent - as is a 'vigilante' - go forth without the anointing of the Holy Ghost.

"total deception" is the only result possible when this is the case.

tom m.

Anonymous said...

Truth Vigilante, with all due respect, who are you trying to convince? Those of us who the Holy Spirit has revealed, through Scripture, the coming Pre-trib Rapture OR YOURSELF? Tom has provided Scripture! I read your comments concerning the timing of the rapture on many other Christian web/blog sites - and you continually state the same thing. Again, I ask...who are you trying to convince? Clearly your mind has already been made up so why bother with debates? Is this to stir the pot? Please let it go, we know your position.

Christsfreeservnt said...

Tom,

I don’t normally enter into such discussions, but I could not help but notice that TruthVigilantee spelled his (or her) name with a double ee, not a single e, such as is the case with the word vigilante: “any person who takes the law into his or her own hands, as by avenging a crime” (dictionary.com).

So, I looked up “vigilant” and this is what it rendered: “keenly watchful to detect danger; wary: a vigilant sentry; ever awake and alert; sleeplessly watchful” (dictionary.com).

So, I thought, what would you call a person who is vigilant? Out of curiosity, I looked up the meaning of the word ending “ee”:

-ee: “a suffix forming from transitive verbs nouns which denote a person who is the object or beneficiary of the act specified by the verb ( addressee; employee; grantee); recent formations now also mark the performer of an act, with the base being an intransitive verb ( escapee; returnee; standee) or, less frequently, a transitive verb ( attendee) or another part of speech (absentee; refugee).” http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/-ee

I know that the word vigilant is an adjective, which is a word to describe a noun or pronoun, such as “a pretty dress,” etc. But, if someone wanted to describe himself or herself as one who is vigilant, and if he or she wanted to do that in one word, although certainly not grammatically acceptable, I suppose, but since one who is absent is an absentee, and one who attends is an attendee, could not one who is vigilant be a “vigilantee”? I mean, if you wanted to give yourself a name, describing yourself who is one who is vigilant about truth, how else would you do it?

It appeared to me that, by the things TruthVigilantee was saying, that this could be a person who is vigilant and passionate about truth, and thus the name, rather than someone who takes the law into one’s own hands, thus the distinction between the single e at the end of the name and the double e (ee), possibly. Just thinking out loud here. I could be off base, but just making an observation, which is what we do, is it not?

You probably already know this about me, but I am of the post-trib rapture leanings, and do believe it is the more biblical approach to the subject, so I tend to agree somewhat with what the other non-pre-trib posters have stated, though I can’t say I agree with them entirely. I like your blog, and I enjoy reading it, and I believe you have a good pulse on a lot of what is going on in the world, but I don’t stand with you on the pre-trib rapture.

Sue

tom m. said...

CFS,

You may go with that interpretation if you like, it does not really make much difference, for this reason: a person who is vigilant for "truth" should then be defending truth. The "pre-wrath" eschatology 'TV' is pushing has no truth whatsoever. The "pre-wrath" view, very bluntly, is an utter distortion of - a total abuse of, Holy Scripture, in particular the "words of the prophecy of this book" i.e. the book of Revelation - Rev. 22:18-19

The name would then actually be an oxymoron.

I'm aware that you also reject the pretribulation rapture. Sorry to hear it though. My position is very clear on this subject, namely this: It is impossible to correctly understand the Word of God apart from the truth of the "pretribulational rapture".

To put the body of Christ into the tribulation reveals no understanding whatsoever of the body of Christ. That is the bottom line, and it is truth. I'll not expound on it here though, other than to reference one verse that identifies those who would 'delay' the coming of the Lord Jesus - which is to hold to the position that his coming is 'not imminent'. Who are these that would limit the Lord Jesus and say 'he cannot come'...?

Matthew 24:48 is the verse. The verse is actually a prophecy, foretelling of a class of 'servants' that would be found toward the end of this dispensation who would deny the LORD his sovereignty - why it is the "evil servant" that says (note: in his heart) 'My lord delayeth his coming' ...

When the Word of God can not be understood aright - it is a sure sign of a 'heart problem'.

The imminent coming of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ is the only possible correct scriptural view.

This is my answer - Matthew 11:15

Christsfreeservnt said...

Back to the subject of "Endgame," I am following another lead (from the Lord, I believe), which led me to Harry S. Truman, the end of WWII, the creation of the UN and the creation of the state of Israel. There was a reference in one article I read referring to Truman getting educated in Zionism, which is what led him to accept Israel (to recognize Israel). Would you be willing to provide a synopsis of what you know about Truman in relation to Zionism and in relation to the creation of Israel and the UN? Or, would lead me to where I can get some good information on this subject(s)? I would appreciate any information you might be able to provide. Thanks Tom. Sue

tom m. said...

re: ...creation of Israel and the UN? Or, would lead me to where I can get some good information

Best thing is probably to just search all the different terms [mentioned below], and then sift through the material. Compare and contrast.

Briefly though, on the creation of modern Israel and the UN, which things are related:

Israel was essentially 'declared' into existence, by the British, and by the UN, and by the Jews themselves - with the help of the British.

The first significant move toward the creation of 'modern Israel' was the "Balfour Declaration" in 1917. The was an official 'declaration' by the British government that Israel deserved a homeland in Palestine because essentially they had long been victims of injustice and 'deserved' it, and thereby necessary actions to accomplish it should be undertaken - even though it was occupied by Palestinians and Arabs. This historic document set things in motion.

The British had at that time authority over the area according to the 'British Mandate'

The UN was officially inaugurated in 1945, but back-room negotiations had been underway for many years before this. Truman was in office in 1945 and merely rubber-stamped along with the leaders of the many other nations what was already put together.

November 1947 the newly formed UN passed a resolution calling for the establishment of a Jewish state.

The next year, 1948, the British 'decided' to put an end to the 'British Mandate' and pull out. This was on May 14, 1948, and the very same day the Jews declared the State of Israel into existence. The US was the first country to recognize the new 'nation of Israel', with Truman rubber-stamping this official recognition within minutes.

Before the ink was dry, the "1948 War of Independence" broke out with the surrounding Arab countries who objected to this intrusion, and Israel 'militarily' defeated them all, actually gaining more territory than originally proposed by the UN when the dust settled.

Political manipulation through and through is how 'modern Israel' came about. Self-declared.

Rev. 18:4

Christsfreeservnt said...

Thank you, Tom, for that synopsis and for answering my question. I have not done a lot of study on the origins of the UN or on how the nation of Israel came about, but I have done some. As time permits, and as the Lord leads, I will look into this subject more. I appreciate you taking the time to respond to my question. Sue