10/20/16

Rigged Elections? 2012 Flashback Kabal Flaunts It - Obama Given 100% And 99% Vote Counts In Precincts Across U.S.

Top originally posted 11-14-12; and below posted 11-12-12 [excerpted]:
***
11-14-12:  22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham

"[here are nine of them; see article for full list]

#1 According to the Election Protection Coalition, voters across the United States reported more than 70,000 voting problems by 5 PM Eastern time on election day.

#2 There were 59 voting divisions in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. In those voting divisions, the combined vote total was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for Mitt Romney.

#3 The overall voter turnout rate in Philadelphia was only about 60 percent. But in the areas of Philadelphia where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed, the voter turnout rate was over 90% and Obama received over 99% of the vote. Officials in Philadelphia have already ruled out an investigation.


#5 Somehow Mitt Romney won 55 out of the 67 counties in the state of Pennsylvania and still managed to lose the entire state by a wide margin because of the absurd vote totals that Obama ran up in the urban areas.

#6 Barack Obama received more than 98 percent of the vote in 10 out of the 50 wards in the city of Chicago.

#10 Barack Obama also received more than 99% of the vote in a number of very important precincts down in Broward County, Florida.

#12 Ten counties in the swing state of Colorado have a voter registration rate of more than 100%.

#13 Barack Obama did not win in a single state that absolutely requires a photo I.D. in order to vote.

#16 In fact, there were reports all over the nation of people being unable to vote because records showed that they had already voted."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The first reports coming out about the ridiculous numbers were from Ohio and Philadelphia. Colorado, Florida, and the city of Chicago can now be added to the growing list of places reporting impossible results. Not like the scripted 'election drama' was ever believable in the first place, but it is still interesting to see the obviously on-purpose nonsensical evidence..." [see post]
________________________________________

11-12-12:  NWO Flaunting Fake 'Electronic' Election? States Report Many Precincts With Zero Romney Votes

"Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes. So how in the world did this happen? Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote."

"Perhaps if there were just one or two precincts where Obama got more than 99% of the vote we could dismiss the results as “statistical anomalies” and ignore them...But there were more than 100 precincts where this happened in the most important swing state in the nation...Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight?"

"But wait, there’s more...In this next set of results we get to see many of the precincts where Mitt Romney received exactly one vote… Do these numbers look believable to anyone out there? ...Now let’s look at some of the Cuyahoga County precincts were Mitt Romney received exactly two votes…. But there are more than 100 precincts where the results look incredibly suspicious. Here are some more precincts [3-6 Romney votes each] where Barack Obama won more than 99% of the vote…"


and... In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes

"'It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch... ...not one contrarian voter in those 59 divisions, where unofficial vote tallies have President Obama outscoring Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0?' [see post]

***
"Note: The author of the above 'Philadelphia' article is actually defending the reported outcome as legitimate. Hard to view these things in any other way than as flaunting by the NWO cabal. Apparently as they believe that they are now in such absolute control, and are so proud of themselves because of it, that they find some perverse pleasure in putting out these impossible numbers - like zero votes, e.g. 19,605 to 0, or one, or two, or four votes... and this has to be seen as a virtual admission to it..." [see post]
__________________________________________________

That was 2012. Election 2016 outcome? Stage is clearly set for massive Ordo Ab Chao. Per design is the only possible way to view it. It can be turned into any size debacle desired. Destruction of the USA the only end goal. In the globalized dream-world of the kabbalista self-styled under-world lords there can of course be no 'USA'. A controlled demolition is the method being deployed to make it happen. Unquestionably 'election-chaos' 2016 intended toward furthering that end.

Controlled demolition think 'twin towers' - which brings instantly to mind Clinton II's absurd little stunt-woman [or man] stand-in 'Hillary collapse' hoax this past 9/11:


Hillary 'Collapses' On 9/11? - Just Like The Twin Towers? Ordo-Ab-Chao 'Election' 9-12-16

The building is wired. Recommend clear the area and watch for falling debris. Rev. 18:4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremiah 9:3 'And they bend their tongues like their bow for lies: but they are not valiant for the truth upon the earth; for they proceed from evil to evil, and they know not me, saith the LORD'

3 comments :

Christsfreeservnt said...

I agree the elections are rigged. The Lord helped me to become aware of this in 2008, before the national election, and that is when I stopped voting. So many things are faked or orchestrated or manipulated these days. It makes you wonder if anything is real. If I can't see it before my eyes, I don't trust it, but even then, do we really know? For instance, are all college and/or professional sporting events rigged? Is it already decided who is going to win the World Series in baseball, for instance? I read somewhere that many people were celebrating Native Americans in place of Columbus Day. http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/09/us/columbus-day-indigenous-peoples-day/. Is there a message there? Would a win for the Cleveland Inidans, then, play into this scenario? Just thinking out loud. Would the message be, perhaps, that we are taking everything back to the way it used to be, like in Agenda 21? I know you probably don't know the answers to these questions. Just throwing them out there for discussion.

tom m. said...

On that topic, for reference see this post from four months ago:

2016 NBA Finals Rigged For 7th-Game "Return Of The King" As-Above-So-Below 6-19-16 Antichrist Ritual? 6-21-16 "For those interested the subject of the rigging of the 2016 NBA finals, it is a hot topic all over the internet. This is so for a number of reasons. For one, when the star players of one team 'disappear', and suddenly become uncharacteristically error prone in the key moments, as was the case with the losing team Golden State in this 2016 NBA finals, it tends to cause suspicion. At any rate, plenty of material out there for any interested. This post is not about searching out the details. Rather, this post is a brief observation on the end result of the 2016 NBA finals, and the overall story-line that, culminating in the seventh game, seemed strongly intended as the fulfillment of a years-in-the-making numerological as-above-so-below ritual. A ritual based on the years-long Lebron 'king' James "return of the king" theme that is - as actually occult-symbolizing the 'return of the 666 Antichrist king' ... Herein seems to lay the ritual of the 7-game history-making first-ever down 3-1 'comeback victory' story-line played out in the 2016 NBA finals. This suggests that the entire series, if not the entire season, would have been 'rigged' for just this purpose..."

Christsfreeservnt said...

Thank you, Tom. I appreciate you sharing that with me. Sue