U.S. Navy To "Change The Language" And Gender-Neutralize Titles - New Titles Due April Fools Day 2016

So long 'seaman': the Navy will ditch gender-specific titles within their ranks

[excerpted] The Navy is throwing gender-specific titles overboard.

In an effort to be more inclusive for the female sailors within their ranks, the U.S. Navy has announced that they will make titles and descriptions gender neutral.

The change would alter the more than 20 Navy titles that currently refer to ‘men’ in their name, including “midshipman,” a title that dates back to the 1600s, predating the formation of the Naval Academy in Annapolis in 1845.

The change would alter the more than 20 Navy titles that currently refer to ‘men’ in their name, including “midshipman,” a title that dates back to the 1600s, predating the formation of the Naval Academy in Annapolis in 1845.

A report with alternative title suggestions is due by April 1, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus told The Navy Times last week.

“The formal barriers for women have been removed. However, changing the language is a final step to removing the informal barriers that still exist,” she said.

re: 'changing the language'

There are two primary things going on here. It was only seven weeks back [link below] that the final barrier preventing the use of women also as expendable cannon-fodder-pawns for Zionist global domination was removed by the kabalist-possessed Zwo strategists [link]. Male, female, no difference - minions are minions and the more you have at your disposal all the better...is the mindset.

This is two agendas being woven together here. One, sending women into combat doubles the size of the 'expendable-pawns' pool; and two, removing gender-specific references forces the advancement of the attempt to reprogram humanity into a submissive, i.e. non "alpha-male" genderless-androgynous class of mindless-drone slaves, i.e. "minions" [see link below].

Both are integral to the ultimate goal which is nothing less than full military conquest of the entire earth and full 'minionization' of all peoples in order to establish their long-awaited novus orodo seclorum - but what in reality will actually become nothing more than the biblically foretold false-Zion [link] Antichrist kingdom-of-darkness [Rev. 16:10-11].

As far as reprogramming the minds of the global populations per the 'minionzation' process, "changing the language is a final step" admit the beast-kingdom planners. No male, no female...just minions.

The U.S. navy now actively participating in that process. And they plan to roll it out on April fools day...

Recommend do not be 'fooled'.
 Rev. 18:4
See: Day Of Infamy: Pentagon OK's Women In Combat For "Our Mission" - i.e. Give Life Or Limbs For Zionist-World-Order 12-3-15 "'...women will now be able to contribute to our mission in ways they could not before”' -- Women sent to the front lines to "contribute"? Yes, they may contribute arms, legs, and their very lives. For what though? For "our mission", says Pentagon chief Ashton B. Carter... which 'mission' very clearly is to "regime-change" and then occupy every so-called "non-integrating nation" on the planet, and then raise their Zionist-antichrist would-be kingdom-come out of the ashes, so that they may then rule as overlords of the entire earth. Quite the 'mission' is it not..." [see post]

also: 'Minions' The Movie 7-10-15: Androgynous Global-Slave Programming..."Because You're A Minion", Says ZWO 7-9-15 "No male, no female in the new transgender world order...only 'minions' -- "Because you're a minion..."
Psalms 74:22 'Arise, O God, plead thine own cause: remember how the foolish man reproacheth thee daily'


Anonymous said...

The Jews in their own words:

"Understanding Transgender Issues in Jewish Ethics
The dominant approach to gender in Western society has its origin in Christian thought that understands both sex and gender as binary. In that understanding, everyone is either male or female, and gender and sex are identical. While Jews gradually absorbed that perspective, classical rabbinic Judaism had a much more sophisticated understanding.

The Talmud contains hundreds of references to other categories. These include, for example, the androgynos (a hermaphrodite with male and female organs), the tumtum(someone with hidden or underdeveloped genitalia), the eylonit (a masculine woman) and the saris (a feminine man). It is clear from even this short list that the Talmud recognizes that sex organs do not necessarily make people purely male or purely female. The Talmud also recognizes that an individual’s gender orientation does not necessarily match his or her sex organs. (...)"

BTw, did you know that Adam was "an androgynous being"? The Jews know this from "Jewish oral tradition" which means that it is written in their Talmud and Kabbalah:

"The fact that the first human was created as an androgynous being gives us much insight into male-female relationships.
To get a clear picture of the Jewish view of womanhood, we must go back to the beginning—the Torah.

In the first chapter of Genesis, the Torah chooses to refer to Adam in the plural:

God created the man in His image; in the image of God He created him, male and female He created them. And God blessed them. (Genesis 1:27-28)

Why “them”? This was before the creation of Eve!

The Jewish Oral Tradition provides us with a fascinating insight into this grammatical oddity. The first human, it tells us, was really an androgynous being, both male and female in one body, sophisticated and self-sufficient.


tom m. said...

To anon the Talmud pusher

re: The first human, it tells us, was really an androgynous being, both male and female in one body, sophisticated and self-sufficient

Can you really believe such absurdity?

You want to reference what is absolutely the most anti-christ literature on the face of the earth to try and prove that Adam the first man was 'androgynous'? - and use Genesis 1:27-28 to 'prove' it, i.e. the ridiculous rabbinic-ism that the use of the word "them" means [quoting what you posted] "male-female in one body"

Funny isn't it how the against-christ Talmud/Kabbalah "Jewish oral tradition" here deceptively uses only the first phrase of verse 28...

leaving out the next phrase, where the LORD God spoke unto 'them' and said this:

"and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply" - Gen. 1:28 (b)

So anon "Jewish oral tradition" i.e. anti-christ Talmud-Kabbalah promoter, you would have us believe that androgynous-Adam was able to multiply by himself?

The book of Titus in the NT has something to say to you or any intrigued by "Jewish oral tradition" i.e. "commandments of men, that turn from the truth" - which are there called "fables"...and says do it not:

'Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth' - Titus 1:13-14

Better heed Titus than Talmud and Kabbalah "Jewish fables"

Anonymous said...

@ tom m.

I don´t believe it since I´m a Christian and believe in the "binary" system that is despiced by the Jews.
I only wanted to point out that the Jews believe it and work worldwide to push it.

tom m. said...

one side note on the term "binary"...

seems to be a relatively new term which has been introduced into the "conversation" on the 'bible and sexuality' - by those who seek to push the no-gender lies

it seems to be a tactic to "change the language" - by removing the words 'male and female' - or to at least take the emphasis off of these correct words as much as possible

this is how the dialectic works - it is designed to get people to give up just a little ground at a time, point by point, until they have been shifted, most often unaware.

Using the word "binary", which is intended to mean only 'two sexes', allows for an 'opposite' position to be argued. One believes in 'binary', the other in 'multi'...and so begins the dialectic

"male and female" has no opposite, hence no points to concede. Important to never let the change-agents define the terms i.e. change the language.

just some thoughts
sticking with male, female

Rev. 18:4