Note: the info in the article posted below evidently only came to light after Bill Gates recent trip to Singapore announcing a 'partnership' between the Gates Foundation and the Singapore government: Gates Foundation to open office in Singapore with EDB's support 5-5-25 "Speaking at the Philanthropy Asia Summit 2025 in Singapore on Monday (May 5), the co-founder of Microsoft said that the office will be established to "access the science to partner with the philanthropic community" and "the research being done" in the country.."
__________________________________________________
Singapore’s draconian vaccine mandate: Citizens face jail time for refusing FORCED medical procedures that do HARM
In a shocking move that tramples on fundamental human rights, Singapore has amended its Infectious Diseases Act (IDA) to force medical procedures on its citizens under threat of imprisonment. The amendments, enacted in 2023 and 2024, grant the Director-General of Health unchecked power to mandate vaccines — even in the absence of an active outbreak — while stripping citizens of legal protections against government overreach.
Under Sections 47, 65, and 67 of the IDA, Singaporeans who refuse government-ordered vaccinations can be fined up to 10,000 (SGD) or jailed for sixmonths for a first "offense." Repeat offenders face double the penalties, with fines up to 20,000 and a year behind bars. Worse yet, Section 67 absolves government officials of all liability, meaning citizens harmed by forced medical interventions have no legal recourse.
PPP politician Derrick Sim, a biotechnology and vaccine manufacturing expert, slammed the law in an April 14 Facebook post: "Section 47, 65, and 67 of the Infectious Disease Act were amended and in effect since 2023. If you choose not to go for vaccination during the next pandemic, you will be deemed to commit an offense. You will be criminalized. The penalty for first-time offense is 6 months imprisonment or up to $10,000 fine, or both.
No Clear Definition of "Reckless Spread": The law states that recklessly spreading a notifiable disease (e.g., refusing vaccination) could lead to life imprisonment under Section 317 of the criminal code. However, it does not define what constitutes "reckless" behavior, leaving room for abuse and political persecution.
"Imminent Outbreak" Justifies Coercion: The Director-General can mandate forced medical interventions based on a subjective belief that an outbreak is "imminent," with no requirement for concrete evidence
.
No Exemptions for Conscience or Religion: The law does not appear to recognize medical, religious, or conscientious objections, treating refusal as a criminal act.
"Other Prophylaxis" Opens Door to Broader Mandates: The vague term "other prophylaxis" could be interpreted to include experimental drugs, forced quarantine, or other invasive measures beyond just vaccines.
Singapore’s law sets a chilling precedent for governments worldwide. If a nation can imprison citizens for refusing medical procedures, what stops other regimes from following suit? The World Health Organization (WHO) is already pushing for a global pandemic treaty that could enforce similar mandates internationally, eroding medical sovereignty worldwide. [see full article at link]
***
More vax next-plandemic maneuvering: CA offering gift cards to get vaxxed for fake Bird-Flu May 2025
Rev. 18:4
-----------------------------------------------------------
Proverbs 18:10 'The name of the LORD is a strong tower: the righteous runneth into it, and is safe'; cf. Philippians 2:9,10-11 [note -- not the 'One World Tower']
__________________________________________________
Singapore’s draconian vaccine mandate: Citizens face jail time for refusing FORCED medical procedures that do HARM
- Singapore’s amended Infectious Diseases Act (IDA) criminalizes vaccine refusal, imposing fines and imprisonment.
- First-time offenders face up to 6 months in jail or a 10,000 fine; repeat offenders face 12months or 20,000 fine.
- Government officials are shielded from liability, leaving citizens with no legal recourse for vaccine injuries.
- The proposal is a direct violation of medical ethics, human rights, and informed consent.
 |
| The Vax-Agenda is alive and well and has not gone away - it has everything to do with connecting all into a 'One World' ID system - medical financial i.e. all-encompassing [see: post] |
In a shocking move that tramples on fundamental human rights, Singapore has amended its Infectious Diseases Act (IDA) to force medical procedures on its citizens under threat of imprisonment. The amendments, enacted in 2023 and 2024, grant the Director-General of Health unchecked power to mandate vaccines — even in the absence of an active outbreak — while stripping citizens of legal protections against government overreach.
Under Sections 47, 65, and 67 of the IDA, Singaporeans who refuse government-ordered vaccinations can be fined up to 10,000 (SGD) or jailed for sixmonths for a first "offense." Repeat offenders face double the penalties, with fines up to 20,000 and a year behind bars. Worse yet, Section 67 absolves government officials of all liability, meaning citizens harmed by forced medical interventions have no legal recourse.
PPP politician Derrick Sim, a biotechnology and vaccine manufacturing expert, slammed the law in an April 14 Facebook post: "Section 47, 65, and 67 of the Infectious Disease Act were amended and in effect since 2023. If you choose not to go for vaccination during the next pandemic, you will be deemed to commit an offense. You will be criminalized. The penalty for first-time offense is 6 months imprisonment or up to $10,000 fine, or both.
No Clear Definition of "Reckless Spread": The law states that recklessly spreading a notifiable disease (e.g., refusing vaccination) could lead to life imprisonment under Section 317 of the criminal code. However, it does not define what constitutes "reckless" behavior, leaving room for abuse and political persecution.
"Imminent Outbreak" Justifies Coercion: The Director-General can mandate forced medical interventions based on a subjective belief that an outbreak is "imminent," with no requirement for concrete evidence
.
No Exemptions for Conscience or Religion: The law does not appear to recognize medical, religious, or conscientious objections, treating refusal as a criminal act.
"Other Prophylaxis" Opens Door to Broader Mandates: The vague term "other prophylaxis" could be interpreted to include experimental drugs, forced quarantine, or other invasive measures beyond just vaccines.
Singapore’s law sets a chilling precedent for governments worldwide. If a nation can imprison citizens for refusing medical procedures, what stops other regimes from following suit? The World Health Organization (WHO) is already pushing for a global pandemic treaty that could enforce similar mandates internationally, eroding medical sovereignty worldwide. [see full article at link]
***
More vax next-plandemic maneuvering: CA offering gift cards to get vaxxed for fake Bird-Flu May 2025
Rev. 18:4
-----------------------------------------------------------
Proverbs 18:10 'The name of the LORD is a strong tower: the righteous runneth into it, and is safe'; cf. Philippians 2:9,10-11 [note -- not the 'One World Tower']
No comments :
Post a Comment