Virginia Quake Explanation Believable? And 3-28-11 Newsweek Apocalypse Cover

Follow up to: 2-22-11 Christchurch Quake Update: NWO Says A Mysterious New Fault Line Is At Fault "...seismologists believe that a brand new fault, one which might have lain dormant for thousands of years, has sprung back into life with devastating consequences" [see post]

And now, just like Christchurch, New Zealand, [above], not to mention Haiti, another 'quake', we are told, hits in a location (Virginia) where there is no fault line. No matter, an 'official explanation' has been offered to further numb the collective mind of John Q. Public:
How could Virginia quake be felt in Canada and crack the Washington Monument?

"...East and West may be one geographical nation, but geologically speaking, they’re as far apart as Hollywood and New Hampshire.

The difference in geology is a main reason why the moderate earthquake centered near rural Mineral, Va., could cause a four-foot-long crack in the Washington Monument and be felt as far away as Toronto, while Western quakes, even if they are stronger, tend not to travel as far.

The Sierra Nevada mountain range that dominates the West Coast pushed up some 40 to 60 million years ago, whereas the Appalachians date back 400 million years or more. The relatively recent and ongoing activity in the West means that there are 10 times more fractures in the surface rock – which tend to dampen earthquake transmission – than in the East."

By contrast, the East coast mountains are much lower, with much more of the original rock now compressed into the valleys, creating a long and uninterrupted rock structure to transmit the power of the quake, Professor Castner says.

Geologists cannot even locate the faults that are responsible for the seismicity; they remain hidden from view in the underlying "basement" rocks, he says. “Such is the case for the Virginia earthquake, where no surface fault has previously been mapped despite the fact that it is a known seismic zone. “

re: moderate 'eastern quake'...felt "far away"

'Western' quakes different than 'eastern' quakes'?

The "moderate" 5.8 Virginia quake could be felt in Canada and crack the Washington monument because eastern quakes travel farther than much larger and more powerful western quakes because the rock is older and compressed into the valleys making for much better transmission...even though no fault lines have ever been mapped? Is that even remotely believable? Common sense says it is no more believable than the 'official explanation' offered to explain the recent Christchurch quakes where, we are told, a mysterious fault line dormant for thousands of years suddenly, out-of-the-blue, roared back to life with a vengeance and rocked their world. What?

Take a close look at this cover of NEWSWEEK magazine dated March 28 & April 4, 2011. Now here is the point. What is the real cause of all the things mentioned there - "tsunamis, earthquakes, nuclear meltdowns, revolutions, economies on the brink, etc."? Is it all naturally occurring or is absolutely everything being somehow manipulated one way or another...to create the NWO of course?

For those who believe that all these things could actually be happening of their own accord..."it's like 'apocalypse now' dude"...the boys over at NWO central have a little message "hidden in plain sight" for you. It gives them quite a chuckle to do that you know. Do you see it?

They want to know...just "how ignorant are you?"
see: 8-23-11 Virginia quake 'as above so below'
also: 8-24-11 Pat Robertson and Virginia quake 'coincidence'
and: 11-22-10 Newsweek Poses Obama As Hindu 'god of destruction' Dancing Shiva
see all: earthquake funny business
Proverbs 9:10 'The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom'

No comments :