'Fake False Prophet' NWP* Francis Performs 1st 'Miracle' Says ZNWO, Venerates Blood Of 'Januarius' i.e. Antichrist

Follow up on: Fake 'False Prophet' Update: *New-World-Pope Francis To Beam 3D Image Of Self To World April 27, 2014 4-3-14 "...this new pope is already being made the subject of a tremendous marketing campaign making him out to be the cohort in crime to the Antichrist, the biblical 'false prophet'. This propaganda campaign is being called the "Petrus Romanus Prophecy", and comes about by way of some mysterious 'Catholic manuscripts'...[and now] 3D images of Bergoglio/Francis beamed live to the world with '13' cameras while he 'canonizes' two of his dead predecessors...Talk about dark ritualistic practices, this one has to be right up there...and the purpose for this..."unprecedented event", is simple to deduce - the fake false-prophet delusion is about to go to a whole new level...Hear ye Hear ye, all the world, come one come all and see the 3D pope - he's bigger than life, you can almost reach out and touch him. All the world marvel and hold him in awe...That's the obvious intent anyway. And what is also obvious is that this little exercise signals a marked pushing forward of the overall fake false-prophet agenda [link]. Which raises the question...how long before the Zionist novus ordo seclorum production managers arrange for Bergoglio/Francis to start doing a few "great wonders" and/or "miracles" here and there, as the Book of Revelation informs the reader that the real '2nd beast' will in fact do when his time really does come [Rev. 13:11-14]...How long? Don't be surprised..." [see post;]
Pope Francis Performs 'Miracle' In Naples; Turns Dry Blood to Liquid

[christianpost.com; excerpted] Pope Francis has been credited with performing a miracle in Naples on Saturday by the Archbishop of Naples, Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe. During a visit to Naples Cathedral, the pontiff venerated a vial of blood belonging to the Neapolitan patron St. Gennaro, who was once the bishop of Naples until he was martyred in 305, and it began to liquify.

The dry blood turned to liquid after the pontiff prayed the "Our Father" over it and kissed the relic, prompting the Archbishop of Naples, Crescenzio Sepe, to declare the rare phenomenon a miracle.

"The blood has half liquified, which shows that Saint Januarius loves our pope and Naples," said Sepe whilst showing the sealed glass ampoule to congregants.

The pontiff then joked about his failure to secure the full love of St. Gennaro, known in English as St Januarius.

"The bishop just announced that the blood half liquefied. We can see the saint only half loves us. We must all spread the Word, so that he loves us more!" the pontiff said.

re: "venerated...[the] blood of...Saint Januarius....spread the word"

Bergoglio/Francis performed a miracle and turned 1700 yr-old dried blood into liquid, say the novus-ordo-seclorum news dispensing agencies. Is that so. A thing so ridiculous as this is barely worth a moment's consideration...except for the fact that it fits perfectly the novus-ordo-seclorum false-prophet-marketing scheme as mentioned in the 'follow up' post linked above - see post. Simple deduction led to the question being asked at that time as to how long until the script would have the [fake] "false prophet" begin doing a few miracles here and there - as it would be impossible of course to ''sell" the whole fake-false-prophet ruse without some miracle-working powers on his part. Had to be...as it says in the Bible that the "false prophet" will have power to do miracles [Rev. 13:13-14]. And sure enough, here is the first report of a miracle-working Francis.

Noteworthy also is the identification of "Januarius", the object of the 'wondrous deed'. "Spread the word" of the blood of Januarius, said Bergoglio/Francis after performing his little 'blood miracle'. Well who then is 'Januarius":

"Janus (Ianuarius)...In ancient Roman religion and myth, Janus (/ˈdʒeɪnəs/; Latin: Ianus, pronounced [ˈjaː.nus]) is the god of beginnings and transitions,[1] and thereby of gates, doors, doorways, passages and endings. He is usually depicted as having two faces, since he looks to the future and to the past... Three etymologies were proposed by ancient erudites, each of them bearing implications about the nature of the god.[4] The first one is based on the definition of Chaos...In this etymology the notion of Chaos would define the primordial nature of the god.[5][6]" [wiki]

The above quote comes from a long article covering many views on the significance of the Roman mythological 'god' Janus/Januarius. Anybody interested can research for them self, but it all comes back to basically the same thing. All wrapped up as neatly as anybody would need it to be, Janus/Januarius is basically the 'god of chaos', which would be the same thing actually as the Kabalistic 'god of ordo ab chao'. Understanding that the Roman gods of mythology are actually devils [1Cor. 10:20], and that to 'venerate' the names of these 'gods', as Bergoglio/Francis is said to have "venerated" the blood of 'Januarius", is devil-worship plain and simple. Ultimately, the reality is that the 'god of chaos' can be only one figure, namely the arch-devil himself, Satan.

This is, once again, all simple deduction. But, it is unavoidably true. Keeping this post as brief as possible purposely, as the whole ritual is transparent enough that it needs no further elaboration, the final 'deduction' leads to another unavoidable conclusion. What we have here, symbolically of course, by way of this fake-miracle deep-dark-ritual, is the fake-false-prophet, portrayed by Bergoglio/Francis, worshiping and "spreading the word" not of the "blood of Christ" [Rom. 5:8-9]...but the "blood of Antichrist".

There is no other way to interpret this, which it must be pointed out, has been done before, and publicized to, all the world. And note especially that Bergoglio/Francis wants to "spread the word" so that "Januarius" will "love us more".

Spreading the word of the Antichrist? That is exactly what the real False-Prophet is to do, when his time does arrive (which is not yet):

Revelation 13:11-12 'And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein* to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed

Prediction: On the marketing campaign for the ZNWO's fake-antichrist and fake false-prophet scheme [see all; link below], in particular at this juncture as regards the fake false-prophet doing 'miracles', which aspect of the overall program now is officially underway...you ain't seen nothing yet.

Be not mystified by this sleight-of-hand *'earth dwellers' [especially Catholics sit up and take notice], the trickery has only just begun.

Rev. 18:4
see all: fake false-prophet pope
1John 5:6 'This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth'


TruthVigilantee said...

Good post!
Let's not overlook that the antichrist rises before the false prophet. The false prophet promotes him after he is public. They will both do miracles anyway. It's a parallel to the Trinity, Jesus comes first, then the 3rd person who promotes and points to Jesus. Anyway, first beast 1, then beast 2 (false prophet) in Revelation.
Good posts here, keep it up!
( :

tom m. said...

re: 1st beast

That's the thing...if it keeps going the way it seems to be going, we'll have to see, then the fake 1st beast is already on the scene - that would be 'O'

see: here and here

Anonymous said...

Beast 1 - Tsipris

tom m. said...

re: Beast 1 - Tsipris

No question that there has been a heavy ad campaign on this guy right out of the box as 'beast 1'...too much even that it seems obvious that 'they' want everybody to think he's 'it'

Whether O hands the fake-ac ball off to him or not there is just no telling now.

Main thing to understand clearly though is that there is absolutely no way possible that the 'real AC' can appear on the world stage yet. The world's stage is not yet set for his arrival; see: 10 kings shall arise - Dan. 7:24

Anonymous said...

Your conclusion (preclusion) re Tsipras is not supported by scripture. Scripture doesn't rule him in, or out, at this time.

John Cole said...


Tom, regarding your article on the ten kings. Is it possible that the ten kings could be in place, just not visibly ruling, part of the Kabbalist Zionist group that controls the world but is not visible to the masses?
Personally, I am open to the possibility that we could see the emergence of the antichrist prior to seeing ten kings. The strongest scriptural support for this is Revelation 17:12.

And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
(Revelation 17:12)

The first part of the verse seems to say that there is a time when the ten kings exist, but "have received no kingdom as yet". But later on "receive power" together with the beast.

I think it is possible that the ten kings could be in place right now, just not visibly, and the reordering of the earth could take place during the tribulation.
Your thoughts?

Here is the fellow I'm watching.
Either the facts presented in the first article are the most astonishing set of coincidences ever, or the principalities and powers that be have their eyes on him for some reason. He turns "33" on the summer solstice this year.



tom m. said...


re: Your conclusion (preclusion) re Tsipras is not supported by scripture. Scripture doesn't rule him in, or out, at this time.

see comment directly below:

tom m. said...


re: "have received no kingdom as yet"

On this, the apostle John saw a vision of the beast with seven heads, ten horns.

The explanation is straightforward: the vision was for the future. The ten kings had not at that time, the days of John, or previous to that time, come to power. John was to understand that this was all future, as you point out.

The Daniel 7 vision of the ten kings says this:

"Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. - Dan. 7:23

All of this must come to pass prior to the appearing of the little horn, aka 'beast 1' aka AC. I would argue that this has in no way happened. There is no one "kingdom" at this time that is yet diverse from all - or totally separated - that has yet succeeded in devouring the whole earth, having tread it down, and broken it in pieces. This is though what the Zionists are still working on. I would argue that to complete this very task is the purpose of the planned fake-Gog Magog. Much of the world - the middle east, Africa, and other regions, not yet totally integrated. This scripted WWIII so-called would in fact tread down the existing order of the world in a final fashion, breaking the whole globe into pieces as it were. Only after this is done, and then reordered, could it truly be described as a "diverse kingdom" - standing alone, out of which ten kings shall then arise to rule over the "whole earth" (nothing less), and another after that - the little horn.. I would argue that this is not something that will not be visible, in other words the world will plainly know it.

Dan. 7:24 "..and another shall rise after them"

The AC cannot "rise" until 'after' all these things. I would argue on this that the thought conveyed by the word "rise" would indicate that any identification prior to this time would not be possible. We are definitely today seeing the devouring and treading-down, but there is still much that needs to happen before it all comes together.

In fact, this kingdom will be the false 'Zion', with the 'man of sin' taking the throne of David in Jerusalem, to rule over the entire world. A fake antichrist coming first appears to be the plan though, so as to be defeated by the real AC so he can then make his claim to be 'God' [2Thes. 2:4]. Many posts on this blog cover these things.

cont. below

tom m. said...

cont from above

Further, and although there are many non-believers on the scriptural teaching of the "rapture" of the church, the Word of God is clear on the point that the real "Antichrist" cannot come on the scene until after the church is removed - it's the 'time of Jacob's trouble', not the time of church's trouble. Note: that would be the true regenerate body of Christ only, not the apostate Laodicean mess running around today saying "My lord delayeth his coming" - Matt. 24:48 [not imminent]. If any do not believe in the "rapture", my position is to have to say that you do not understand the Word of God aright. At any rate i'm not interested in getting into rapture debates with those who have their minds made up already, not in a comment thread at least...

This does bring one point to light though, which is that unbelief in the rapture makes a correct eschatological interpretation impossible. Once that is taken out of the equation then it goes all over the map. For instance, it is clear that the "diverse kingdom" must be in place before the tribulation begins, as the Rev. 6:2 white horse rider and the little horn (eleventh king) of Daniel 7 that "rises after", are one and the same...and the Rev. 6 white horse rider aka 'the Antichrist' going forth (rising to power) happens at the opening of the first seal, which is the beginning of the tribulation. Understanding correctly the rapture and believing it gives us clearly on this point that the bride of Christ will never see "the man of sin" as they are seen in heaven before the first seal is opened. Rev. 5:9-10

The rapture of the true church has not happened, the AC cannot "go forth" or "rise". Impossible. Adhering closely to the Word of God is the only safe ground. As for the numerology surrounding any one individual, it is very possible that the kabalists have cooked the books because that is what they do. It's all lies and sorcery. For instance, who can prove what day Prince William was really born, or how old he is. That's just what the public is told. Since when is anything 'they' say believable - like where was O really born, or what is his real name, or who are his real parents - nobody knows. Lies and sorcery.

All must be taken together to come to the correct conclusion. That this is the only possible correct scriptural interpretation on these issues is my decided argument. No real Antichrist yet, absolutely not, but a fake one...apparently that is the plan.

Rev. 18:4

John Cole said...

Very good arguments. Thanks Tom

tom m. said...


Anonymous said...

Tom, thank God (& you) for the truth of the Holy Spirit that guides your comments, quite literally in this case. The rapture is a 'hard saying' for some, a subject of coarse jesting for others, but the most precious promise for those of us that have ears...
The MSM and current events wreak of deception. For the most part it seems blatant: the recent 'unveiling' of the riderless '(black) 'gift- horse' http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/mar/05/fourth-plinth-provocative-artwork-gift-horse-hans-haacke-unveiled-in-london - complete with stock exchange ticker tape. The 'resurrection'/ exhumation and reburial of king Richard III, the last plantagenet aka Rosicrucian ruler. 'Kamikaze pilot' in passenger planes - within spitting distance of the newly rebooted LHC... On and on it goes.
The barley is ripe. Maranatha.

Anonymous said...

Thanks. I wasn't trying to be argumentative, sorry for the terseness of the tone, as it could be read as such. The referenced scripture doesn't give explicit timing, nor intervals outside of the 7 years, nor specify what arrived on the scene means. I don't think it precludes him from being alive, and in leadership right now, just not at "the" leadership point he will be at to fulfill prophecy. The entire sequence of "events" could transpire starting "tomorrow" (i.e. the rapture could start this very millisecond, there is no way to know and there is nothing needed yet to precede it happening, that I'm aware of)...and of course, since that is not precluded from happening today, the beast would by necessity need to already be a grown man, if it were to happen today. That's why he's not "precluded" from the discussion. That's all I'm trying to indicate. Of course, our eyes should be on Christ, not Satan regardless. For a believer, the identify of the anti-christ is a non-issue.