Even if Amy Barrett is confirmed to SCOTUS, she's still a statist who promotes forced vaccinations and indefinite lockdowns
[excerpted] Conservative darling Amy Barrett is for indefinite lock downs, forced vaccination
Republicans are on the verge of electing one of the most egregious authoritarians, a woman who has a track record of defending the power of the state over the freedom of the individual.
In 2020, Judge Barret sided on behalf of J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois — giving him supreme authority to lock down the state for as long as he pleases.
Judge Barrett gave in to the authoritarian left by hiding behind a 1905 ruling in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts. This ruling gave local Massachusetts authorities free reign to vaccinate and re-vaccinate every adult in their jurisdiction and fine those who did not comply:
Barrett is prone to side with the state in all matters of public health hysteria, disregarding individual liberty, medical privacy, informed consent and human rights. She concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois and agreed to hold down the people of Illinois through indefinite, illegal lockdowns and economic restrictions. If nominated, Barret would continue to allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety and protecting the “greater good.”
If nominated, Barrett would ultimately rule in favor of compulsory vaccination, giving government the power to force experimental covid-19 injections, faulty flu vaccines, and all other pharmaceutical products that are promoted as one-size-fits-all “public health” solutions.
Judge Barrett would allow governors to restrict religious freedom... [read full article @ link]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As always...they are all in on it together, nothing more than a giant dog and pony show - everything all of it. Scripted, staged, manufactured, orchestrated, obedient role players taking their cues and reading their lines. Ruth Bader Ginsburg departs the stage immediately before the big Trump-Biden election-2020 circus kicks off? You think? What are the odds of that. And of course here now comes the new Scotus pick Coney-Barrett out from behind the curtains, right on cue, to star in the next scene as the "anti-abortionist"..which of course is guaranteed to trigger enormous opposition - exactly as planned. Let the ordo-ab-chao begin... maybe foment more riots, destroy more cities, then turn the Biden-Trump election show into a daymare-nightmare scenario, and voila, just sit back and watch the USA further disintegrate. Ultra-transparent is it not these absurd schemes of the would-be Zio-Kingdom-Komers?
And then there is team-player Coney-Barrett herself - proven to be so by her judicial track record as a "mandatory vaxxer" and "indefinite lockdown" proponent and facilitator, as well also one who has shown herself more than willing to restrict religious freedoms. Additionally on the mandatory-vaxx subject another judge stated that the use of the 1905 case cited by Barret to justify her ruling mentioned in above article was very weak and highly questionable at best [see full article @ link on these two items].
All a mirage a kabalistic-sorcery numerology delusion. Truth is this znwo-nwo could never happen any other way though. Be not miraged by all the dogs and ponies performing to the organ music and all the rest of it. It's a sad spectacle. fyi
Rev. 18:4
***
Compare: Trump-Putin..All In On It Together 7-8-17
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isaiah 1:4 'Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward'
[excerpted] Conservative darling Amy Barrett is for indefinite lock downs, forced vaccination
Republicans are on the verge of electing one of the most egregious authoritarians, a woman who has a track record of defending the power of the state over the freedom of the individual.
In 2020, Judge Barret sided on behalf of J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois — giving him supreme authority to lock down the state for as long as he pleases.
Judge Barrett gave in to the authoritarian left by hiding behind a 1905 ruling in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts. This ruling gave local Massachusetts authorities free reign to vaccinate and re-vaccinate every adult in their jurisdiction and fine those who did not comply:
Jacobsen v. Massachusetts (1905): “The board of health of a city or town if, in its opinion, it is necessary for the public health or safety shall require and enforce the vaccination and re-vaccination of all the inhabitants thereof and shall provide them with the means of free vaccination. Whoever, being over twenty-one years of age and not under guardianship, refuses or neglects to comply with such requirement shall forfeit five dollars.”
Barrett is prone to side with the state in all matters of public health hysteria, disregarding individual liberty, medical privacy, informed consent and human rights. She concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois and agreed to hold down the people of Illinois through indefinite, illegal lockdowns and economic restrictions. If nominated, Barret would continue to allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety and protecting the “greater good.”
If nominated, Barrett would ultimately rule in favor of compulsory vaccination, giving government the power to force experimental covid-19 injections, faulty flu vaccines, and all other pharmaceutical products that are promoted as one-size-fits-all “public health” solutions.
Judge Barrett would allow governors to restrict religious freedom... [read full article @ link]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As always...they are all in on it together, nothing more than a giant dog and pony show - everything all of it. Scripted, staged, manufactured, orchestrated, obedient role players taking their cues and reading their lines. Ruth Bader Ginsburg departs the stage immediately before the big Trump-Biden election-2020 circus kicks off? You think? What are the odds of that. And of course here now comes the new Scotus pick Coney-Barrett out from behind the curtains, right on cue, to star in the next scene as the "anti-abortionist"..which of course is guaranteed to trigger enormous opposition - exactly as planned. Let the ordo-ab-chao begin... maybe foment more riots, destroy more cities, then turn the Biden-Trump election show into a daymare-nightmare scenario, and voila, just sit back and watch the USA further disintegrate. Ultra-transparent is it not these absurd schemes of the would-be Zio-Kingdom-Komers?
And then there is team-player Coney-Barrett herself - proven to be so by her judicial track record as a "mandatory vaxxer" and "indefinite lockdown" proponent and facilitator, as well also one who has shown herself more than willing to restrict religious freedoms. Additionally on the mandatory-vaxx subject another judge stated that the use of the 1905 case cited by Barret to justify her ruling mentioned in above article was very weak and highly questionable at best [see full article @ link on these two items].
All a mirage a kabalistic-sorcery numerology delusion. Truth is this znwo-nwo could never happen any other way though. Be not miraged by all the dogs and ponies performing to the organ music and all the rest of it. It's a sad spectacle. fyi
Rev. 18:4
***
Compare: Trump-Putin..All In On It Together 7-8-17
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isaiah 1:4 'Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward'