Follow up on: Tsunami Hits Indonesia Sunda Strait 12-22-18 No Quake - Like Sulawesi, (Man Made) Tsunamis The New 'Smart Fires'? 12-22-18 "Here we go - tsunamis that cannot be explained any time any place ... the Sulawesi tsunami [9-28-18] was reported as being generated by an on-land earthquake [which is not possible]. In other words this just allowed another extremely anomalous 'new-normal' disaster scenario to be created..." Sulawesi the first, now only three months later, another not-believable unexplainable tsunami. ...It is very clear where this is going." [see post, video]
***
222 on 12-22?
Why a tsunami struck Indonesia without warning
A tsunami that devastated the area around Indonesia's Sunda Strait, leaving at least 222 dead and hundreds more injured, struck fast and without warning on Saturday [12-22-18].
"This was not a common tsunami," said Costas Synolakis, director of the University of Southern California's Tsunami Research Center. "This was a volcanic tsunami ... the Tsunami Warning Centers were essentially useless."
"A volcano is something that is a living thing... "Eventually it's going to have a landslide, and if it’s underwater, going to displace water and make a wave."
"It's bad that this occurred at night ...
"Actually, the tsunami was not really big, only one meter," said Prasetya, who has closely studied Anak Krakatau. "The problem is people always tend to build everything close to the shoreline."
Synolakis said it's unrealistic to expect everyone to leave the coasts, but added that those who are in high risk areas should be aware of the serious potential for a catastrophe — a point Okal echoed.
"If you're at the beach — which you should be at, enjoy the beach — but if you see anything anomalous, shaking or strange behavior, just run away," Okal said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re: 'without warning...not a common tsunami'
Not a common tsunami? - no of course it wasn't.
Sunda Strait Indonesia tsunami 12-22-18; 222 reported perished. Although that number likely changes, it is at this point on the day after [12-23], plastered all over everywhere - '222' screaming from the headlines. 222 on 12-22.
222 x2. What does that say. Numerology always tells the tale.
Tsunami no warning, in the dark 9:30 in the evening local time. Underwater, unseen, unfelt, unexplainable but had to be volcano-related...the 'official explanation'. Not a huge wave says the official story but in the dark nobody of course could see anything anyway. Which means that only the 'experts' can tell us what actually happened:
'Expert' Prasetya right on cue immediately points out what the real problem is:
"...people always tend to build everything close to the shoreline."
2nd 'expert' Synolakis also immediately 'throws-out there' a comment on the same subject making reference to the idea of "people leaving the coasts" - which of course is pure Agenda 21 high-doctrine through and through - for their own safety of course... because of the "high risk...of...serious catastrophe" - which of course is inherent to any coastal location ...everybody knows that ...right?
3rd 'expert' Emile Okal "echoes" that with his own warning...essentially saying that beaches are no longer to be considered a safe place, and that people while at the beach should probably be always on the watch for "...anything anomalous, shaking or strange behavior".
So, tsunamis would not be a problem if people did not build on shorelines, and people should limit their beach activities because coasts are dangerous. Without question that is exactly what 'experts' Prasetya, Synolakis, and Okal are here saying.
Any coincidence that what these 'experts' are saying lines up perfectly with the very recent "Federal Climate Report" calling for relocating coastal communities inland:
New Federal 'Climate Report' Says Coastal Communities To Be 'Relocated' Inland - A21 Geo-Attack End-Game Now Seen 11-24-18
No chance of coincidence. And no such thing as mystery tsunamis. And there is such a thing as geoengineered tsunamis [see follow-up at top - video]. They are very real.
And yes this now further advancement of the A21 no-coastal-living narrative is a direct result of the 'new-normal' mystery tsunamis. Cui bono always the same.
And one more thing of note: We've met 3rd 'expert' Emile Okal before. Interestingly enough, Okal is the researcher who finally in 2006 'explained' the mystery April fools-day 1946 Pacific-wide tsunami that had been unexplained for over 60 years:
'Unexplainable' April Fools Day 1946 Pacific-Wide Tsunami Man Made? Tsunami Bomb[s]? (posted 4-1-14) "... researcher Emile Okal did publish a new research paper...to 'scientifically explain' the highly anomalous too small of an earthquake for a giant tsunami event... Apparently, doing this just required a rewriting of all the original data..." [see post]
222 on 12-22. Um no. Not in the real world.
Be informed.
Rev. 18:4
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremiah 5:22 'Fear ye not me? saith the LORD: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand for the bound of the sea by a perpetual decree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it?'
***
222 on 12-22?
Why a tsunami struck Indonesia without warning
A tsunami that devastated the area around Indonesia's Sunda Strait, leaving at least 222 dead and hundreds more injured, struck fast and without warning on Saturday [12-22-18].
 |
| screenshot |
"A volcano is something that is a living thing... "Eventually it's going to have a landslide, and if it’s underwater, going to displace water and make a wave."
"It's bad that this occurred at night ...
"Actually, the tsunami was not really big, only one meter," said Prasetya, who has closely studied Anak Krakatau. "The problem is people always tend to build everything close to the shoreline."
Synolakis said it's unrealistic to expect everyone to leave the coasts, but added that those who are in high risk areas should be aware of the serious potential for a catastrophe — a point Okal echoed.
"If you're at the beach — which you should be at, enjoy the beach — but if you see anything anomalous, shaking or strange behavior, just run away," Okal said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
re: 'without warning...not a common tsunami'
Not a common tsunami? - no of course it wasn't.
Sunda Strait Indonesia tsunami 12-22-18; 222 reported perished. Although that number likely changes, it is at this point on the day after [12-23], plastered all over everywhere - '222' screaming from the headlines. 222 on 12-22.
222 x2. What does that say. Numerology always tells the tale.
Tsunami no warning, in the dark 9:30 in the evening local time. Underwater, unseen, unfelt, unexplainable but had to be volcano-related...the 'official explanation'. Not a huge wave says the official story but in the dark nobody of course could see anything anyway. Which means that only the 'experts' can tell us what actually happened:
'Expert' Prasetya right on cue immediately points out what the real problem is:
"...people always tend to build everything close to the shoreline."
2nd 'expert' Synolakis also immediately 'throws-out there' a comment on the same subject making reference to the idea of "people leaving the coasts" - which of course is pure Agenda 21 high-doctrine through and through - for their own safety of course... because of the "high risk...of...serious catastrophe" - which of course is inherent to any coastal location ...everybody knows that ...right?
3rd 'expert' Emile Okal "echoes" that with his own warning...essentially saying that beaches are no longer to be considered a safe place, and that people while at the beach should probably be always on the watch for "...anything anomalous, shaking or strange behavior".
So, tsunamis would not be a problem if people did not build on shorelines, and people should limit their beach activities because coasts are dangerous. Without question that is exactly what 'experts' Prasetya, Synolakis, and Okal are here saying.
Any coincidence that what these 'experts' are saying lines up perfectly with the very recent "Federal Climate Report" calling for relocating coastal communities inland:
New Federal 'Climate Report' Says Coastal Communities To Be 'Relocated' Inland - A21 Geo-Attack End-Game Now Seen 11-24-18
No chance of coincidence. And no such thing as mystery tsunamis. And there is such a thing as geoengineered tsunamis [see follow-up at top - video]. They are very real.
And yes this now further advancement of the A21 no-coastal-living narrative is a direct result of the 'new-normal' mystery tsunamis. Cui bono always the same.
And one more thing of note: We've met 3rd 'expert' Emile Okal before. Interestingly enough, Okal is the researcher who finally in 2006 'explained' the mystery April fools-day 1946 Pacific-wide tsunami that had been unexplained for over 60 years:
'Unexplainable' April Fools Day 1946 Pacific-Wide Tsunami Man Made? Tsunami Bomb[s]? (posted 4-1-14) "... researcher Emile Okal did publish a new research paper...to 'scientifically explain' the highly anomalous too small of an earthquake for a giant tsunami event... Apparently, doing this just required a rewriting of all the original data..." [see post]
222 on 12-22. Um no. Not in the real world.
Be informed.
Rev. 18:4
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremiah 5:22 'Fear ye not me? saith the LORD: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand for the bound of the sea by a perpetual decree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it?'
No comments :
Post a Comment
Unfortunately verification hassle has been made necessary due to infestation of spam-bots - AVRev. 18:4