This post is a follow up on: NFL Players Union President Says Homosexual Athletes "Showing New Dimension Of Masculinity" 5-6-13 "'I've been so proud to be a part of this segment of athletic history because we are taking this on and we are redefining masculinity and showing a new dimension of masculinity that I'm so proud to be a part of,' [NFLPA predident] Foxworth said"...On an interesting aside, now can be seen the madness of dressing the players in all the various sports in hot pink 'accessories' over the last year or so. Pros, colleges, and even high schools. Shoes, gloves, head bands, even jerseys...all in the name of "breast cancer awareness"...or covert homosexual tolerance training in actuality....even conditioning the fans who then become accustomed to seeing their 'sports heroes' dressed in hot pink. That was [is] redefining in action. Unfortunately for the fan, it will not be possible to even watch pro sports anymore without being subjected to an endless homosexual-acceptance dialectic from the commentators. The reality is that they will be out of a job unless they are reading the prepared script. This is a fact...and has to be faced. Adios pro sports...and colleges will be next...and no doubt they've got a scheme lined up for high schools too...Babylon has risen. Bow not to Baal. [see post]
***
Football in pink? - can it even be taken seriously any more...
That colors have strong psychological and perhaps even physiological effects on people is an accepted reality. No one will argue against that being true. So that being true, and seeing that the psychological manipulators of the NWO Social Programming Department have decided to take the "manly" "macho" "aggressive" sport of football and manipulate the viewing experience by dressing out the players, the referees, the TV personalities, and even the stadiums, in the feminine color of pink - is it possible to participate in this color-driven psychological social manipulation, just by even watching, without being affected 'psychologically'? Answer: it is not. It is impossible. To not reject...is to accept. To accept is to submit, willingly or unconsciously, to the mind warping gender-bending social conditioning program being foisted upon the sports-frenzied masses worldwide.
Pink is feminine. Baby boys get blue, baby girls get pink, it has always been that way because pink is feminine. Feminine and pink is a good thing. Pink is the antithesis of masculine though. That is the reality. This brings up the topic of the follow up post linked above, regarding the statement by the NFLPA that they are "redefining masculinity". It is not hard to comprehend how associating football and pink is actually an obvious strategy being used to accomplish that goal. For the players, and the emulating youth, the effect has to be even more powerful. Pink-madness is at the college and high school level, working that subtle unseen gender-bending psychological effect on all - exactly as designed. Unfortunately, sports fans, there is only one answer - have to walk away. Either that or get pink-ified.
Psychological Properties Of Colours - PINK:
Positive: Physical tranquillity, nurture, warmth, femininity, love, sexuality, survival of the species.
Negative: Inhibition, emotional claustrophobia, emasculation, physical weakness.
Pink is a powerful colour, psychologically. It represents the feminine principle, and survival of the species; it is nurturing and physically soothing. Too much pink is physically draining and can be somewhat emasculating.
Rev. 18:4
----------------------------------------------------------
Here is what it says in the OT - just for a point of reference: Deut. 22:5 'The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. '
***
Football in pink? - can it even be taken seriously any more...
That colors have strong psychological and perhaps even physiological effects on people is an accepted reality. No one will argue against that being true. So that being true, and seeing that the psychological manipulators of the NWO Social Programming Department have decided to take the "manly" "macho" "aggressive" sport of football and manipulate the viewing experience by dressing out the players, the referees, the TV personalities, and even the stadiums, in the feminine color of pink - is it possible to participate in this color-driven psychological social manipulation, just by even watching, without being affected 'psychologically'? Answer: it is not. It is impossible. To not reject...is to accept. To accept is to submit, willingly or unconsciously, to the mind warping gender-bending social conditioning program being foisted upon the sports-frenzied masses worldwide.
Pink is feminine. Baby boys get blue, baby girls get pink, it has always been that way because pink is feminine. Feminine and pink is a good thing. Pink is the antithesis of masculine though. That is the reality. This brings up the topic of the follow up post linked above, regarding the statement by the NFLPA that they are "redefining masculinity". It is not hard to comprehend how associating football and pink is actually an obvious strategy being used to accomplish that goal. For the players, and the emulating youth, the effect has to be even more powerful. Pink-madness is at the college and high school level, working that subtle unseen gender-bending psychological effect on all - exactly as designed. Unfortunately, sports fans, there is only one answer - have to walk away. Either that or get pink-ified.
Psychological Properties Of Colours - PINK:
Positive: Physical tranquillity, nurture, warmth, femininity, love, sexuality, survival of the species.
Negative: Inhibition, emotional claustrophobia, emasculation, physical weakness.
Pink is a powerful colour, psychologically. It represents the feminine principle, and survival of the species; it is nurturing and physically soothing. Too much pink is physically draining and can be somewhat emasculating.
Rev. 18:4
----------------------------------------------------------
Here is what it says in the OT - just for a point of reference: Deut. 22:5 'The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. '
We gotta have pink chainsaws too.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=650985031600142&set=a.197275280304455.45301.112832382082079&type=1
Here's the photo John - STIHL's contribution to the effeminization of America [only viewable from actual blog page - from comment page click orange post-title link above]:
ReplyDelete[im]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rCIwIAqZNB4/UmsA-UDwm4I/AAAAAAAADUc/b6hN_PIOyBk/s1600/stihl+saw.png[/im]
Turn the color off your flatscreen tv to avoid the pinkwashing propaganda.
ReplyDelete...ah gots to walk
ReplyDelete