Clip is from 5-26-13 'Fox News Sunday'. Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin is asked whether or not he sees a problem with the Justice Department being appointed by BO to review their own actions as far as monitoring journalists, to which he basically answers "no":
“You’ve raised an important point and I heard Sen. Graham call for special counsel...I’m not ready to do this at this moment."
He then goes on to say that perhaps it may be a good idea to come up with some sort of a "media shield law" though to protect 'real' journalists...like those with FOX or AP, but, bloggers and 'tweeters'...well.....maybe not so much:
:30 “But here is the bottom line — the media shield law, which I am prepared to support, and I know Sen. Graham supports, still leaves an unanswered question, which I have raised many times: What is a journalist today in 2013? We know it’s someone that works for Fox or AP, but does it include a blogger? Does it include someone who is tweeting? Are these people journalists and entitled to constitutional protection? We need to ask 21st century questions about a provision that was written over 200 years ago.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything according to the Zionist kingdom-come 'ordo ab chao' script [link]. Always. Break a 'story' about the NWO monitoring their own NWO news outlets, then come in with the 'solution' in the form of some sort of media protection law...which just so happens to conveniently exclude 'non-journalists'. That's where they're going with this. Transparent as can be. fyi
***
Compare: Australians React To Government's New Web Censorship, Describe As "Totalitarian" 5-21-13 "Censorship i.e. silencing non NWO-supportive speech, has been simmering on the back burner for the past few years. That is not the case any longer. It is now on the front burner and the heat is being turned up....everywhere. They call it the 'dark knight rising'...[see post]
Rev. 18:4
“You’ve raised an important point and I heard Sen. Graham call for special counsel...I’m not ready to do this at this moment."
He then goes on to say that perhaps it may be a good idea to come up with some sort of a "media shield law" though to protect 'real' journalists...like those with FOX or AP, but, bloggers and 'tweeters'...well.....maybe not so much:
:30 “But here is the bottom line — the media shield law, which I am prepared to support, and I know Sen. Graham supports, still leaves an unanswered question, which I have raised many times: What is a journalist today in 2013? We know it’s someone that works for Fox or AP, but does it include a blogger? Does it include someone who is tweeting? Are these people journalists and entitled to constitutional protection? We need to ask 21st century questions about a provision that was written over 200 years ago.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything according to the Zionist kingdom-come 'ordo ab chao' script [link]. Always. Break a 'story' about the NWO monitoring their own NWO news outlets, then come in with the 'solution' in the form of some sort of media protection law...which just so happens to conveniently exclude 'non-journalists'. That's where they're going with this. Transparent as can be. fyi
***
Compare: Australians React To Government's New Web Censorship, Describe As "Totalitarian" 5-21-13 "Censorship i.e. silencing non NWO-supportive speech, has been simmering on the back burner for the past few years. That is not the case any longer. It is now on the front burner and the heat is being turned up....everywhere. They call it the 'dark knight rising'...[see post]
Rev. 18:4
No comments :
Post a Comment
Unfortunately verification hassle has been made necessary due to infestation of spam-bots - AVRev. 18:4